PL EN
Dynamic load on the head during rear impact against a headrest
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Machine Construction, Maritime University of Szczecin
 
2
Military Institute of Armoured and Automotive Technology
 
3
Military University of Technology
 
4
Department of Electrical Engineering and Power Electronics, Faculty of Mechatronics and Electrical Engineering, Maritime University of Szczecin
 
 
Corresponding author
Tomasz Pusty   

Department of Machine Construction, Maritime University of Szczecin
 
 
Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 2025; 19(7)
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
A model of the dynamics of a vehicle collision with an energy-absorbing barrier was built in the PC-Crash 10.0 environment, using the following models: vehicle motion dynamics, collision, and multibody models of people seated on seats. The energy-absorbing barrier was composed of connected elements whose motion was described by Newton's and Euler's equations. Rear seat passengers were modeled as polyhedral systems, each consisting of 20 rigid solids connected by spherical joints. The simulations investigated the effects of different head restraints and seatback settings configurations on the dynamic loads acting on the head of a passenger seated in the rear bench seat. The results showed that the value of the coefficient describing the risk of head injury, decreased as the angle of the backrest tilt increased, indicating that the head is better protected with greater tilt. The stiffness of the headrest significantly affected the value of the coefficient describing the risk of head injury, i.e., with a higher stiffness of 20000 N/m, a strong negative correlation was observed, indicating a lower risk of injury. In contrast, at lower stiffnesses, the correlation was more variable, with different results depending on the angle of the backrest. The results underscore that proper configuration of the backrest and seat tilt angles, as well as headrest stiffness, are key to minimizing head injuries. Particularly favorable values of the coefficient describing the risk of head injury were achieved at angles of 5° and 10° and corresponding values of headrest stiffness. In general, a negative correlation was observed between the backrest tilt angle and the HIC36ms value, i.e. the larger the tilt angle, the lower the HIC36ms value, which means better protection. At the lower stiffness of the headrest 15000 N/m, the correlation was variable, both positive and negative, depending on the backrest tilt angle.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top