More details
Hide details
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, 03690 Sant Vicent del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain
Publish date: 2016-03-01
Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 2016; 10(29):132–140
The paper presents a purpose-built laboratory stand consisting of a Vicon motion capture system with reference video cameras, wireless EMG system, Concept 2 Indoor Rower ergometer, wireless heart rate monitor and the Nexus software. A pilot study of people who exercise on the ergometer helped to create a proper configuration of all the components of the laboratory. Moreover, a procedure for carrying out research was developed, which consists of several steps divided into 4 stages: preparation of the motion acquisition system; preparation of the participant; familiarising participants with the technique of rowing, recording their movements and acquiring other measurement signals. Preliminary analysis of the results obtained from heterogeneous signals from various devices showed that all the components of the research stand are mutually compatible and the received signals do not interfere with one another.
1. Baker J., Gal J., Davies B., Bailey D., Morgan R., Power output of legs during high intensity cycle ergometry: influence of hand grip. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 4 (1), 2001, 10–18.
2. Baker J., Thomas N., Davies B., Pshysiological, biochemical and mechanical issue relating to resistive force selection during high-intensity cycle ergometer exercises. Journal of Exercises Science & Fitness, 7(2), 2009, 551–560.
3. Baudouin A, Hawkins D., Investigation of biomechanical factors affecting rowing performance. Journal of Biomechanics; 37, 2004, 969–976.
4. Baudouin A., Hawkins D., A biomechanical review of factors affecting rowing performance. Journal of Sports Medicine; 36, 2002, 396–402.
5. Bregler Ch., Malik J. Video Motion Capture. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH. Vol. 98. 1997.
6. Bregler Ch., Motion capture technology for entertainment. IEE Signal Processing Magazine, Nov. 2007, 156–160.
7. Brodie M., Walmsley A., Fusion motion capture: a prototype system using inertial measurement units and GPS for the biomechanical analysis of ski racing. Sports Technology 1(1), 2008, 17–28.
8. Buckeridge E., Hinslop S., Bull. A., McGregor A., Kinematic asymmetries of the lower limbs during ergometer rowing. Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise, 44(11), 2012, 2147–2153.
9. Cerne T., Kamnik R., Vesnicer B., Gros J., Munih M., Differences between elite, junior and non-rowers in kinematic and kinetic parameters during ergometer rowing. Human Movement Science 32, 2013, 691–707.
10. Cheung G., Baker S., Kanade T., Shape-from-silhouette of articulated objects and its use for human body kinematics estimation and motion capture. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Society Conference on. Vol. 1. IEEE, 2003.
11. The Concept II ergometer user guide.
12. Deutscher J., Blake A., Reid I., Articulated body motion capture by annealed particle filtering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2000. Proceedings. IEEE Conference on. Vol. 2. IEEE, 2000.
13. Fothergill S., Examining the effect of real-time visual feedback on the quality of rowing technique, Procedia Engineering 2, 2010, 3083–3088.
14. Guillemin M., Gillam L., Ethics, reflexivity and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry 10(2), 2004, 261–280.
15. Harriss D.J., Atkinson G., Ethical Standards In Sport and Exercise Science Research: 2016. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 3(12), 2015, 1121–1124.
16. Jones J., Allanson-Bailey L., Jones M., Holt C., An ergometer based study of the role of the upper limbs in the female rowing stroke. Procedia Engineering 2, 2010, 2555–2561.
17. Kirk A., O’Brien J., Forsyth D., Skeletal parameter estimation from optical motion capture data. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005, CVPR 2005, IEEE Computer Society Conference on. Vol. 2, 2005.
18. Kurihara K., Optical motion capture system with pan-tilt camera tracking and real-time data processing. ICRA, 2002.
19. Menache A., Understanding motion capture for computer animation and video games. Morgan Kaufmann, 1-3, 2000, 32–36.
20. Moeslund T., Granum E., A survey of computer vison-based human motion capture. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 81, 2001, 231–268.
21. O’Brien J., Bodenheimer B., Brostow G., Hodgins J., Automatic joint parameter estimation from magnetic motion capture data. 1999,
22. Panjkota A., Stancic I., Supuk T., Outline of a qualitative analysis for the human motion in case of ergometer rowing. WSEAS International Conference. Proceedings. Mathematics and Computers in Science and Engineering. Eds. I. Rudas, M. Demiralp, and N. Mastorakis. No. 5. WSEAS, 2009.
23. Pelz P., Verge A., Validated biomechanical model for efficiency and speed of rowing. Journal of Biomechanics 47, 2014.
24. Plug-in Gait Model,
25. Roetenberg D., Luinge H., Slycke P., Xsens MVN: full 6DOF human motion tracking using miniature inertial sensors,Xsens Motion Technologies BV, Tech. Rep, 2009.
26. Sforza Ch., Casiraghi, Lovecchio N., Galante D., Ferrario V., A three-dimensional study of body motion during ergometer rowing. The Open Sports Medicine Journal, 6, 2012, 22–28.
27. Silaghi M., Plankers R., Boulic R., Fua P., Thalmann D., Local and global skeleton fitting techniques for optical motion capture. Modelling and Motion Capture Techniques for Virtual Environments, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998, 26–40.
28. Vlasic D., Adelsberger R., Vannucci G., Barnwell J., Gross M., Matusik W., Popović J., Practical motion capture in everyday surroundings. In: ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 26(3), 2007.
29. Witkin A., Popovic Z., Motion warping. Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, 1995.