PL EN
Estimation of moisture content of cellular concrete with different apparent densities by TDR method using machine learning methods and regression analysis
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Technology, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
 
2
Lublin University of Technology Doctoral School, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
 
3
Department of Conservation of Monuments, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 40, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
 
4
Department of Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 40B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
 
 
Autor do korespondencji
Zbigniew Suchorab   

Department of Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 40B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
 
 
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
DZIEDZINY
 
STRESZCZENIE
The moisture content of building materials, especially in porous media, such as cellular concrete, is a serious problem affecting the durability, quality of thermal insulation and safety of structures. Traditional methods of moisture assessment, based on gravimetric laboratory analyses, are time-consuming. The alternatives are the indirect techniques, such as time-domain reflectometry (TDR), which allow for quick measurements by analyzing the dielectric properties of materials. The aim of this work was to develop predictive models estimating moisture content of cellular concrete depending on its apparent density and other material parameters. The article used both classical regression models θ(ε), θ(ε,ρ) and artificial intelligence methods, including neural networks (NN), regression trees, support vector machines (SVM) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) models. The θ(ε) model performed best at cellular concrete type 400 kg/m³ (R² = 0.9433), but its accuracy declined at higher densities. The universal θ(ε,ρ) model gives better results at 500 and 600 kg/m³ type cellular concretes, with an overall R² of 0.9340. However, AI models outperformed both of them. The GPR model achieved near-perfect predictions (R² ≈ 0.9999, RMSE = 0.0021 – 0.0032 cm³/cm³), while SVM and NN also showed high accuracy (R² = 0.9914–0.9960) with significantly lower errors than deterministic regression models. Comparison of the effectiveness of these approaches allowed for the assessment of the accuracy of moisture prediction based on different data sources. The obtained results indicate the significant potential of AI application in monitoring the moisture content of building materials, offering more effective and precise diagnostic tools compared to traditional methods.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top